rdkit.Chem.PropertyMol module¶
-
class
rdkit.Chem.PropertyMol.PropertyMol(mol)¶ Bases:
rdkit.Chem.rdchem.Molallows rdkit molecules to be pickled with their properties saved.
>>> import os >>> from rdkit.six.moves import cPickle >>> from rdkit import RDConfig >>> m = Chem.MolFromMolFile(os.path.join(RDConfig.RDCodeDir, 'Chem', 'test_data/benzene.mol')) >>> m.GetProp('_Name') 'benzene.mol'
by default pickling removes properties: >>> m2 = cPickle.loads(cPickle.dumps(m)) >>> m2.HasProp(‘_Name’) 0
Property mols solve this: >>> pm = PropertyMol(m) >>> pm.GetProp(‘_Name’) ‘benzene.mol’ >>> pm.SetProp(‘MyProp’,’foo’) >>> pm.HasProp(‘MyProp’) 1
>>> pm2 = cPickle.loads(cPickle.dumps(pm)) >>> Chem.MolToSmiles(pm2) 'c1ccccc1' >>> pm2.GetProp('_Name') 'benzene.mol' >>> pm2.HasProp('MyProp') 1 >>> pm2.GetProp('MyProp') 'foo' >>> pm2.HasProp('MissingProp') 0
Property mols are a bit more permissive about the types of property values: >>> pm.SetProp(‘IntVal’,1)
That wouldn’t work with a standard mol
but the Property mols still convert all values to strings before storing: >>> pm.GetProp(‘IntVal’) ‘1’
This is a test for sf.net issue 2880943: make sure properties end up in SD files: >>> import tempfile,os >>> fn = tempfile.mktemp(‘.sdf’) >>> w = Chem.SDWriter(fn) >>> w.write(pm) >>> w=None >>> txt = open(fn,’r’).read() >>> ‘<IntVal>’ in txt True >>> try: ... os.unlink(fn) ... except Exception: ... pass
The next level of that bug: does writing a depickled propertymol to an SD file include properties: >>> fn = tempfile.mktemp(‘.sdf’) >>> w = Chem.SDWriter(fn) >>> pm = cPickle.loads(cPickle.dumps(pm)) >>> w.write(pm) >>> w=None >>> txt = open(fn,’r’).read() >>> ‘<IntVal>’ in txt True >>> try: ... os.unlink(fn) ... except Exception: ... pass
-
SetProp(nm, val)¶
-